70 - 200mm f/4. Lens Construction: 20 elements in 15 groups. Diagonal Angle of View: 34°- 12°(with full-frame cameras) Focus Adjustment: AF with full-time manual. Closest Focusing Distance: 3.94 ft. / 1.2m. Filter Size: 7-group helical zoom (rotational angle: 72°) Max. Diameter x Length, Weight: 67mm Re: RF 70-200/4.0 vs 2.8. I agonised over the extra cost of the 2.8 but went for it. My main use is field sports where the shallower depth of field at 2.8 is very useful. Using it on an R5 (in combination with an R6 plus EF 400 f/2.8) and value the 70mm end so not missing the teleconverter option. Nikon’s new 70 200 f4 are double in terms of price, but perhaps has a little higher quality. Compare to the non stabilized Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 lens the real wold picture quality is not really different. The brighter lens is better in the corners, the f/4 version has a hair better contrast. For portraits the brighter version has a bigger You can attach 77mm filters to the filter thread on the front of the lens. NOTE: Only one filter may be attached. If you need a polarizing filter, use the Canon Circular Polarizing Filter PL-C B (77mm) Detach the lens hood when attaching or detaching the Circular Polarizing Filter. Applicable Models. For reference, I use the EF 70-200/4L IS currently as my main lens in this range. The EF lens (first version) is narrower and uses 67mm filters, but it's longer than the RF, especially with the adapter. For hiking I'm not really interested in wildlife photos so can live with 200mm. But the 100-400 reviews well. Focal length range: 70-200mm Maximum aperture: f4 Lens construction: 16 elements in 13 groups Minimum focus: 1.2m Filter size: 67mm diameter Dimensions (Diameter x L): 76.0mm x 172.0mm Weight: 705g Retailers CamBuy www.cambuy.com.au Digital cameras, lenses and accessories with 100% genuine Australian manufacturer’s warranties. Ph: (02) 9029 2219 The Canon shows less vignetting at f/4 at the wide end, shows slightly less lateral CA at 70mm and shows somewhat less flare effects. The Sony has less geometric distortion overall. Comparing the Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS Lens to the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Lens shows the two very similar overall. Perhaps the biggest difference shown Canon EOS R, Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8L IS USM at 170mm, 1/2500sec at f/2.8, ISO 400. Users will find f/11 delivers good edge-to-edge sharpness too, but the introduction of diffraction does start to soften finer detail beyond this point all the way to its minimum aperture of f/32. Some minor purple and green fringes of colour were observed along Canon EOS 5D mk IV is the best of Canons (but still behind Sony and Nikon), DxOMark says. Battle of the $2,499 Canons: Canon 5D Mark 4 vs. Canon R6. Sirui’s new Saturn 35mm T2.9 full-frame 1.6x anamorphic cine lens is smaller than a can of coke. The Tamron 70-210mm f/4 goes up against the new Canon 70-200mm f/4 IS II and Nikon 70-200mm f/4 VR A great option is to combine this lens with the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens or Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Lens for an incredible pro-grade, lightweight kit for many needs. Drop a small 50mm lens in your bag if you are concerned about the 35-70mm focal length gap. RC3q.